Agenda
Roland Hinterhölzl (University of Venice)
Title: Complementizer Agreement and Referential Anchoring: from Movement to Agreement
Abstract:
It is generally assumed that a clause is temporally and modally anchored by the inflectional properties of the finite verb:
Tense connects the event expressed by the verb to the speech time
Mood indicates whether the event expressed by the verb is related to a situation in the actual world or to a situation in world that is distant from the actual word
I will argue in this paper that
A) the subject plays a crucial role in this anchoring relation, for two reasons:
a) semantic: Nominal expressions analysed as relations between individuals and
events are referential and can be anaphoric and refer back to a topical situation
b) syntactic: I assume that the values for reference time and speech time are assigned
in Fin0 in the C-domain; for reasons of locality it is the subject in [Spec,TP] that
enters into an Agree relation with Fin0 rather than T0
B) Complementizer Agreement (CA) is a grammatical reflex of this licensing relation
a) Double Agreement (DA) is the result of movement of a subject clitic or a correlate of the subject to Fin0 (since the subject is unable to move to [Spec,FinP] in embedded clauses)
b) standard CA results from a reanalysis of DA as an Agree relation between Fin0 and the subject in [Spec,TP]